E BERR GOMZOU setu pezh a lar un divroad db e brezidant

 

Why does Putin do this? He is destroying his own country. Is it over for Putin?

Probably, he expected Ukraine to fall shortly after the Russian troops entered the country. I read rumours that there were hidden agents in Kiev tasked with acts of sabotage. Most of them sabotaged their sabotage, because they knew how ill-prepared and untimely the whole operation was and that they were risking their lives if they sided with the Kremlin. Putin obviously had a plan in his head. And, as the subsequent events showed, that plan was spectacularly flawed. Publicly disregarding the failure, he decided to go forth with it, tweaking it on the go, while killing people of both nations in desperate attempts to “save face”.

The widespread opinion is that Putin's invasion is a crime. I would argue that it was a mistake. In politics, a mistake is infinitely worse than a crime, because a crime, no matter how terrible, can be an instrument in achieving a goal. If the goal is achieved, the crime gets vocally condemned but defacto is forgiven. But a mistake is a sign of incompetence, which cannot be forgiven neither by foes, nor by friends. Let alone persisting in that incompetence, which resulted in a war, which in itself is worse than all conceivable crimes combined.

Seems like planning never was Putin's forte. For 20+ years he's been in power, he never managed to explain to the country and the people what our goals are, ignoring among other things the crucial matters of politics with other countries on the post-Soviet space, including, most prominently, Ukraine.

Had Putin left office in 2008, he'd have gone down in history as Russia's greatest ruler, who managed to secure never before seen prosperity without violence and exploitation. Now I see him as a power hungry maniac incapable of admitting that he wasn't the only smart and competent person in the country.

paradoxe

ur saviad kasaus eo dont da vout kenbrezelour pa ne fell ket d'an unan

TAGET omp bet gant b war zigarez hon defe manket

Respontet hon eus n'hon eus ket manket e mod ebet

ADTAGET OMP MET AN TAOL MAN a-gevret gant un all a ve kiriek d'ar mank

PEZH EO...ne c'heller ket tamall ac'hanomp evit bezañ heuliet ar pezh a oa skrivet ha degemeret ganto ha ganimp-ni ivez anat eo, dre ma kavas deomp e oa aes hag eeun, ha n'eo ket ni a lavar ar c'hontrol: int-i a pretant n'eo ket splann, n'eo ket skrivet mat, ez eo faziek.

LEZVARN a ra ur fazi peogwir e devoud e rank adkemer an arguzennoù

eil abadenn:

setu ni ret deomp tagañ, -dav ve sevel un dresadenn o tiskouez an dud hag ar fiñvadennoù

*********************************************

tri frantad a voe:

1 prantad an divizoù, labourus met kaset da bennvat: neuze oa degemeret ar gerioù evit pezh oant. Neuze e oa un dalvoudegezh gant ar gerioù o klotañ gant divizoù splann a gaver o zroidigezh er gerioù-se. Dispis int peogwir e oa dav bout dispis. N'helle ket o mignon reiñ pep tra d'e bratikoù: n'helle ket da skouer skrivañ ne vije nep ti, nep prenestr, nep diaezamant, hep nep riskl ebet...Tra ar brenerien eo em soñjal (roet m boa ur roadmap ha sklaer eo ar pezh a c'houlennen digant ar dachenn: skrivadenn da immo hag int-i ivez e-kerz an divizoù...)

Hag un dra all a deu war va spered: addivizout priz an ti; se zo un dra a c'hell bout graet ivez dirak lezvarn, pa ez eus un diforc'h spontus etre ar marc'had hag ar pezh zo bet graet. Tle ket bout aezet dont war giz evit ur seurt tra, met me gav din eo ret bout engorto: ac'halese o goulenn evit priz an ti-ha neuze talañ e oa tud all war ar renk (roet d'an aodren war an diwezhadoù; ar roadmap avat zo em galloud hepken! met gouzout a ran e vo dav reiñ va roadmap  da c'houzout, peogwir e teu er c'hoari! da heul an divizoù kentidik ma oa bet va breur o reiñ an dosier dezhañ. (Mizioù diwezhañ va labour 'ni oa; ne ouie ket!)

AR PRANTAD KENTAN ZO HOLLBOUEZUS DRE MA VEZ GRAET UR BERN LABOUR ARAOK EM GAVOUT DA SINAN adsinañ evit kadarnaat zo un abadenn all.

2 prantad ar sinadurioù ent-kefridiel ha dirak an holl: degemeret ar pezh a oa bet divizet a-ziagent, degemeret hag asantet d'ar poent pouezusañ ma siner ur wech ha da viken, o abadenn zo damechu.

Ar sirk zo bet ne dalv ket netra; ur vezh eo derc'hel da zivizout goude ar pezh oa bet graet a-ziagent. Ouzhpenn se, e kav din ez eo reizh ha skrivet splann e c'hellont em dennañ kuit ha ne reont ket.

3 ur prantad nevez a zo digoret ganto dre ma 'z eus un neudenn danav ouzh o stagañ d'an ti nevez savet war an dachenn dispartiet diouzh o hini.

Un nebeut gerioù ez eus bet asantet dezho: o disteurel a reont. Peseurt mod? dre blantañ e penn an dud gerioù all da veuziñ ar gerioù kentañ,

dre ziskouez traoù a seblant faziek, pe divalav ha larout diwar o fenn ez eo dre fazi ar re all

dre em silañ er frazennoù hag en darvoudoù bet evel pa ne vefent ket bet oberiant enno ivez

N'eus bet nep kemm gant ar pezh oa rakdivizet. Kaset da benn eo bet pep kraf.

MAR NE BLIJ KET AN DISOC'H DEZHO EO DRE MA Z EUS PRENISTRI TROET WAR DU O MOGER RETER

RAK SE E LARONT EO DIGRESKET TALVOUDEGEZH O ZI

ABALAMOUR EZ EUS PRENISTRI TROET WAR DU O MOGER NORZH RETER HAG EMAINT DINDAN SELLOU O AMEZEIEN O MOGER NORZH RETER ZO DINDAN SELLOU O AMEZEIEN DIOUZH LAEZ GANT UR PRENESTRIG BENNAK TRAKEN.

GOUZOUT A OUIENT NE C'HELLE KET BOUT E MOD ALL! ken em soñjal ur vunutenn, e vije un ti, e vije prenistri, na c'hellemp ni ar werzherien nemet ober e-giz ma ne vije nemet an nebeutañ posubl peogwir e tibabjemp ar brenerien, hag o embregadenn: pa eo bet anat deomp e oant un tiegezh a feson vat hon eus gwelet mat e klote an dazont gant an disentezioù.

BACK FROM GWID AND WINTER TIME TEMPERATURES BUT NO WIND NO SNOW

Many in America and, no doubt, other Western countries have groused about the cost and inventory depletion of aiding Ukraine. However, as this article from the Atlantic Council points out, it is certainly not a one way street. The West reaps multiple benefits from backing Ukraine against Russia Ukraine is often viewed as being heavily reliant on Western support but the relationship is mutually beneficial and provides the West with enhanced security along with valuable intelligence, writes Taras Kuzio. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/the-west-reaps-multiple-benefits-from-backing-ukraine-against-russia/?mkt_tok=NjU5LVdaWC0wNzUAAAGJRyHukRRPp3WwdzOmRq1SD_kQ8GIWaidmO8X25hawTB8yJYaTlIdRmhU9VACYN8EEy4HVYRsaMQOoJVB-vTOvwkedFnqPpxpFdrbQRZ0hQ4g In simple terms: “The most important of these advantages are being won on the battlefield. In short, Ukraine is steadily destroying Russia’s military potential. This dramatically reduces the threat posed to NATO’s eastern flank. In time, it should allow the Western world to focus its attention on China. Defeat in Ukraine would relegate Russia from the ranks of the world’s military superpowers and leave Moscow facing years of rebuilding before it could once again menace the wider region. Crucially, by supporting Ukraine, the West is able to dramatically reduce Russia’s military potential without committing any of its own troops or sustaining casualties.” But you needn’t believe me or even the Atlantic Council’s author. As Condoleeza Rice (former Secretary of State) and Robert Gates (former Secretary of Defense) co-wrote in the Washington Post: “The way to avoid confrontation with Russia in the future is to help Ukraine push back the invader now. This is the lesson of history that should guide us, and it lends urgency to the actions that must be taken, before it is too late.” There are three other major advantages to helping Ukraine win victory over Russia: (1) It has reinvigorated the West in general and NATO in particular in a way that hasn’t been seen since the fall of the USSR and brought two additional members to the alliance; (2) It has encouraged Europe to move towards renewable energy and away from being held hostage by Russia’s provision of fossil fuels; and (3) Ethically, morally, politically and spiritually, it is simply the right thing to do. GLORY TO UKRAINE!

forfait bouyg

pour 80 giga, ca vaut le coup pour mt plus que pour moi jy sui mais parce que j'i box or dès que ce sera fini donc que faire?

17 janvier

 il fait beau à Lanzarote

les chars vont entrer en action, ce ne serait que pour des raisons de maintenance que les Leclerc ne seraient pas du voyage14/200 et pièce etc mais des Allemands et des UK qui donnent le signal qu'il faut augmenter la pression, donc l'escalade

M va sortir de H Brest pour deux semaines  à la maison avec perfusions, marcherait des 50 aines de mètres, pas brillant

Bet e kreiz kêr d'ober anaoudegezh gant un den eus landerne d'ober war dro moneiz; evit ur bloavezh eo mat gwelet e vo goude ugent mil euro, komzet hon eus eus ar stocks eveljust, disônjet komz eus aour eveljust - ne fell ket dezho komz eus ar releg barbar ar reoù-se!

Yen eo betek en hon ti pa emañ ar chodierenn o vont da vezañ kemmet, un tamm ne ya ket endro.

SOLEDAR mines and wagner and REINFORCEMENTS COMING FROM WESTERN COUNTRIES

Russians took most of Soledar over the past couple of days. Expect their propaganda and trolls to milk this ‘victory’ for all its worth and then some. There were also attacks towards Vuhledar in the south, near Kremina in the north and everywhere in between.

Russians basically threw their entire army on the offensive all across the front line. You could be excused for not noticing it, it’s largely ineffective. Yes, Wagner forces may have succeeded in taking Soledar, by paving the approaches with corpses of their men. Russians also launched attacks with negligable successes elsewhere. This is the vaunted second wave of mobilized pesonnel, men who actually did recieve some training. The first wave was in late 2022 and allowed Russia to prevent front lines from collapsing. This second wave is supposed to be what wins them the war.

The fact they’re using them as cannon fodder all over the front line indicates the most they can hope for is to prevent any further Ukrainian breakthroughs until the spring mud season sets in six weeks from now. This is how World War 1 ended, first in the east and then in the west - a mass offensive all over the board that could no longer be countered by the defender, because they had nothing left to fight with.

The problem Russia faces is that Ukraine still has plenty left to fight with and is actually growing stronger. The fact they threw their most capable units into Soledar (a target of marginal importance to take Bakhmut, itself of minor importance) shows their real goal is showing a gain, any gain, they can then spin as a major turning point to feed domestic audiences.

For all we know this is also the ultimate goal of the offensive: give propaganda material for domestic audiences to keep the unwashed masses placated for another couple of months. We do know more is not really achievable at this point.

vendredi 13 janv 23

 

The US, France, and Germany just decided they'll send another weapons package to Ukraine.

I don’t use this term lightly but this time we can talk about the introduction of game-changing systems:

• 50 US-made Bradley infantry fighting vehicles (IFV),
• 40 German “Marder” IFVs, and
• an unknown number of French AMX-10 RC light tanks.

And this is probably only the beginning, there’s more to come. As soon as these weapons are on the battlefield, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be able to conduct what is called combined arms warfare operations, for the very first time:

All major weapons systems you need for an effective armored attack are now available to them:

• Tanks (T 72 etc. plus AMX 10)
• IFVs (Marders and Bradleys)
• Anti-Air systems (German Gepards)
• Artillery (Panzerhaubitze 2000 and others)

Without the Bradleys and the Marders, the Ukrainian infantry was simply unable to follow their tanks. Their vehicles were either too lightly armored to be used on a hot battlefield (the M113, for example) or they were unable to keep up with the tanks in heavy terrain (the Boxers, and all other wheeled vehicles).

Now every vehicle the Ukrainian Army needs to conduct a “classical” armored operation is heavily armored and on tracks. This means they can work together.

We can expect major combat operations involving these vehicles as soon as in late March or April. Based on what we’ve seen so far on the battlefield, we can expect these operations to be highly successful.

There’s nothing the Russians can do about it. They don’t have the means to counter this kind of attacks. All they can do is hope that the Americans and Germans don’t decide to donate their modern Main Battle Tanks (Abrams and Leopard 2) to Ukraine. If this happens, I wouldn’t want to be an occupier living in Donetsk or Crimea.

To answer the question: Ukraine isn’t losing this war. The free world is on their side and together, we will prevail.

emziskouezataerezhioù ar werc'hez

 emziskouez-ioù ar werc'hez

reizh kenañ ar ger kentañ nemet e koller ar silabenn gentañ kent tizhout an hini diwezhañ.

gouzout a raer eo trawalc'h d'ar ger luniet en empenn e ve dezhañ ur penn a-raok hag ur penn-adreñv stabil

neuze e c'heller komz eus ar c'haieroù a oa laret n'oa ket anezho, kavet e kalatrez an It P pehini he doa gwelet ar werc'hez meur a wech hag embannet he c'homzoù.

N'he doa ar vaouez-se gwelet ar werc'hez nemet peogwir houmañ a'n em ziskouezas dezhi abalamour da gas en-dro ur c'hemenn da vout embannet d'ar bed gallek- a zo ar bed bras evel ma ouzer. Neuze he doa hi ranket kaozeal galleg hag an dra-se an hini en doa va lakaet d'he goulennata en aner. Komzet he doa galleg ha netra ken. Pezh oa dibosubl d'am soñj peogwir ne veze nemet yezh ar vro tro-dro ha nebeut tre a c'halleg- gouzout a ran e oa galleg gant tud zo, en o zouez ar re o doa roet bod en o fennoù degemerus da gomzoù sañset ar werc'hez.

Preder en linenn

 ur pdf emaon o vont d'ober gant holl rakskridoù abanna, pehini oa sklaer dezhañ da belec'h e kase e dreid war-eeun bepred; souezhus eo gouzout e varv ur seurt den, hag em c'houlenn a raer pezh a chomo war e lerc'h implijet da vat ha n'eo ket bruzhunoù dastumet diwar arlerc'hiadoù caddyiou;

siwazh d'un ampoent e rank an den mont en e roud, ur stourmer betek penn ez eo bet hag ur spont eo gwelout na pegen emaberzhet edo evit palioù ha na oant ket mui komprenus diwar ar poent ma oa dilezet amkanioù boutinoc'h hag aesoc'h da gompren: an emsav ha kement zo da laret eo dieubidigezh, dizalc'hiezh, nerzhioù merat, ensavadurioù hag all: perzhioù ur vro emren par d'an holl vroioù all

war ul live all edo em lakaet a-gevret gant un nebeut tud all da gas war-raok ha da uhelaat ur yezh, evel pa vije bet c'hwitet ganti pazennoù zo hag e oa un dever, ur c'hoant, ur c'halvidigezh, ur redi, he c'has en-dro evit brasañ mad ar preder pa ne ve ken, ha war gement tachenn zo eus ar vuhez kempred

ne ouzon ket piw a sammo an atebegezh, ar giriegezh, ar galonegezh hag all, da sevel e boltred rak emichañs e vo amjestr, ha degemeret fall gant tud all a oa enebet outañ hag ouzh kement a rae; ar re-se a chom war o bernig sevenadurezh tremenet, evel pa - ya evel pa, ivez- vije chomet sac'het emdroadur ar bed er bloavezhioù war-lerc'h ar brezel bed kentañ; evel pa vijent bet heuget gant ar brezel ha c'hoant ganto na welout pelloc'h. Dont mat en-dro goude loustoni ar brezel bed kentañ, hag echu. MET AR BED EN DEUS DALC HET DA VONT.

remember Villepin Chirac, and summary for current war

What were the most courageous decisions taken by French presidents?

February 2003. President Jacques CHIRAC stood up against immense pressure from the US and opposed in the UN Security Council the ill thought out Second Iraq War. Let me remind you of that page of history.

After the Twin Towers attack, the US benefited from a lot of sympathy all over the world and the 2001 expedition against the Taliban in Afghanistan was approved unanimously by the Security Council. Two years later in 2003 it was important for George W. Bush to have a UN sanction for the invasion it planned against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.

The pretext for that invasion was the purported possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction by Iraq. There is however quite a bit of evidence that the entourage of Bush had been preparing that war for over a year. Indeed VP Cheney and Secretary Rumsfeld believed that democracy could be established in the whole of the Middle East starting with Iraq and then Syria. However the UN by the resolution 1441 had established a regime of inspections of Iraq and two neutral inspectors (backed by a lot of experts) have been travelling around the country and looking for the WMD’s – and not finding any.

The CIA to please its political masters had been supplying some fake evidence…it is debatable whether President Bush and Secretary Colin Powell believed in good faith that an invasion of Iraq was warranted.

FRANCE ALONE IN THE SECURITY COUNCIL STOOD UP TO CONDEMN THE WAR.

Jacques Chirac knew something about wars : he had volunteered for service in the Algerian War and had seen first hand the terrible consequences of armed conflicts. One of his much quoted sentences was : “You don’t bring democracy to a country in an armoured car”.

Chirac’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Dominique de Villepin made a much celebrated speech and pointed out the reasons why the US was about to lead the world in a an enormous disaster

In this speech Villepin foretold all the consequences of the American initiative : destabilization of the whole region, civilian and military casualties . (the death toll would include 140.000 Iraqi civilians and 4000 US soldiers).

Chirac’s envoy also pointed out that the US would step in a very complicated region it knew little about. Shiite-Sunni opposition, Kurds, Saddam Hussein’s Baathist Party, warring tribes…barging in a beehive was not only stupid but even counter productive !

Chirac’s initiative broke the unanimous Security Council front the US tried to create : while some traditional allies followed the ill conceived American initiative (UK’s Tony Blair in particular) Germany as well as Russia and China voted against the war.

France had to pay a heavy price for not going with Bush. It was one of the leading creditors of Iraq. When the US restarted the oil exports and generally resumed serving Iraq’s debts, it forced the French to write off 95 % of its pending loans. Initially US public opinion became strongly anti-French…until it became conscious of the full effects of the second Iraq war . The best selling book by Bob Woodward “Plan of attack” did a lot to inform the general public about the true background of Bush’s initiative; The world is still suffering from its consequences.
--------------------------
Putin started this war to strengthen Russia’s strategic position and begin steps toward dismantling NATO or removing them as a threat. Ironically, the opposite happened.

    The Russian military has proven itself to be sub-par in every respect. Their airforce is incapable, their ground forces are poorly supplied, their weapons are outdated, and their commanders are bafoons
        American military planners are LOVING this. We get to see what Russia is capable of militarily and what its flaws are. Now we know exactly how strong Russia is and what they can do.
    NATO has only gotten stronger. Thanks to Russian aggression NATO countries are rapidly expanding their militaries and the US is deploying more troops to Europe.
    10 years ago being “neutral” was seen as an alternative to siding with NATO or Russia. You could trade with both nations and keep out of the drama. Today it’s been demonstrated what happens to “neutral” countries like Ukraine and so many nations are seeking NATO membership and protection
    Russia can’t do anything. 75% of their military is locked down in Ukraine and they cannot afford to pull a single troop out. The remaining 25% is needed to secure the border and put down riots and protests. Russia doesn’t have any men left to attack another country

Then we get to nukes- Putin loves to saber rattle with nuclear bombs.

Here’s the thing. Russia has not deployed its nuclear submarines nor is these submarines being fitted for combat. Russia has not increased activity around nuclear silos. Russia has not scrambled its nuclear bombers.

For all of Putin's talk about nuclear war, he isn’t taking any action to actually start said war. Why?

Well because the US has 400 Minuteman III ICBMs prepped for launch. Within minutes 400 nuclear warheads can be en route to Russia. This many nukes would destroy the Russian population, render the country uninhabitable, and likely kill Putin and his family. If Putin is lucky- he will survive as the dictator of nothing but craters (and that’s a big if).

So Putin won’t nuke anyone. It makes no sense. He would rather take his chances and surrender because the second he launches nuclear weapons he for sure loses everything.

Russia has proven itself to be a threat. It’s not a dangerous threat (minus the nukes) and can easily be defeated by NATO forces but it is a threat regardless.

So every “neutral” country within range of Russia needs to join NATO. Putin will be pissed but he can and won’t do anything.

Then we let Putin make his choice. He can invade Finland and be absolutely crushed by the weight of NATO forces or he can back down and hopefully die like the good little fascist he is.

We aren’t going to get anywhere if we tiptoe around because we are afraid of Russia. The US and NATO need to take drastic steps now and call Putin’s bluff.

English from the news Ventura et brel L'emmerdeur, le rapace 1967!

 On the long run (next decades) France will probably take the lead, yes. Thanks to structural reasons and oceanic EEZ untapped opportunities. Which is why we invest in the navy more than in Caesar cannons (even if more cannons could have proven useful this year). But that's far away and many things could happen in the meantime (a stronger EU integration allowing for France UNSC veto to turn into an EU one could be a good idea, for instance)
rance already is an emerging global superpower. France had just sealed deals with Indonesia, Qatar, India, Croatia, Egypt, Greece and Morocco for military equipment. France is already building a new naval base in Cyprus, is openning a new company in Greece under NavalGroup for the production of corvettes and is planning for a 6th gen fighter. The French army is one of the most experienced militaries by now, with military operations across the globe. France is also strengthening its position in Africa and seems to be in good terms with Spain, Italy and Greece for various issues.

On the other hand, Germany will be paying the mistakes of its past, and up until that moment, she will be under the shadow and control of France and the Anglo-Saxons.
Things are moving quickly this decade. It is hard to predict what will come of it. I do hope our German friends (whatever the occasional feuds, we're on the same monetary boat ahahah) manage all of this correctly. We're lucky to have many countries, many talents, many views in the EU. It will pay despite the mistakes (like hammering Greece…).

There's just one point I disagree with, and it's Africa. Both because of former mistakes and current propaganda (Russia and China sponsored, mostly) France situation in Africa is deteriorating fast these days. Nothing Fatal, but just like Germany with energy France will have to manage that turn correctly, and evolve
And for what little credit we can still give to Vladimir Putin words.

But someone has to, yes. And like Macron said (if I recall correctly) “better for the interlocutor to be us rather than Erdogan". I tend to agree with my palatial office Weasel on that one.
What could European countries that are currently donating weapons to the cause in Ukraine, potentially do in terms of covert action? Could we do anything directly that looks like it was probably Ukraine… Covert missile launches maybe?

One word. Reconnaissance.

How does Ukraine keep finding these buildings full of Russian troops? The Fuel depots? The weapons caches? The allegedly secret Russian supply lines?

Reconnaissance.
Whether it be from Western ELINT aircraft or Special Forces…who I have no knowledge of operating in Ukraine, whatsoever…operating deep behind Russian lines, knowledge is the most powerful weapon on the battlefield. Outside of weapons deliveries and weapons training, the best thing allied nations can offer Ukraine is information.

peseurt ger evit addicterezh hag drammidi pe an devoud bout sot gant udb hep bout gouest da virout

 N'eus forzh ar ger, daoust ma vezo bastus muioc'h mui ober implij anezhañ peogwir e teu an dud da vezañ direzon ha mont da heul red an amzer eveljust na c'heller netra enep dezhi - ha gwregel, benel ez eo ar ger?- met mont a raer ivez da heul red ar c'heleier hag ar c'helachoù a bourvezer deomp dibaouez evel glav, kazarc'h, avelioù oc'h ober.

Mont a ra pep hini, gwitibunan, da heul red ar pezh a gouezh warnomp dizehan.

Dav e ve mont er penn a-raok er c'hontrol da red ar ster, hen diskouez a ra buhez ar pesked mat tre. A-wechoù em lezel da vont, met peurliesañ enebiñ ouzh red ar ster. Excelsior da voto, da c'her ardamez.

Neuze eo kregiñ er binvioù ret-holl, en diazezoù diarvar e-lec'h balafenniñ.

AON RAK UDB HA C'HOANT MEMESTRA KEJAN GANTI

KLASK WAR LERC'H UDB DAOUST D'AN AON EM GAVOUT GANTI RAK ENNI HA GANTI EZ EUS POAN BENN DA GAOUT

HA KOULSKOUDE EZ EUS UR REDI O VOUNTAN AN DEN DAVIT AR BOAN BENN A ZO GANT AN DRA A ZO EN E C'HOANAG HAG AN AON .

KOULZ EO LAVAROUT E KLASKER AN AON dle ANDORFINOU LAKAOMP ha war an dro ar goanag e vo torret d'an aon-se, ar pezh a zo gwelloc'h c'hoazh, enepandorfinoù (ANEZHO ANDORFINOU IVEZ A DALVEZ DA VOUT LAOUEN HA DISTANET.

KLASK A RAER AN TAN HAG AN DISTAN WAR UN DRO? PEOGWIR E OUZER MAT E VO DISTAN GOUDE AN TAN.

EVEL AN DUD DISTABLIL O SPERED A GUSTUM TROC'HAN O C'HROC'HEN GANT BEG UR GONTEL PE UR SKALPEL HAG A C'HALV AR MEDISIN GOUDE ...

amerika liesamerika

 DEUX AMERIQUES pour des raisonnements simplistes, une intellectuelle et progressiste etc
et une basique qui se sent victime, fragile, première, pionnière mais des pionniers qui resteraient des pionniers ad vitam aeternam jusqu'au retour du rédempteur, brutale éventuellement, prête à sortir l'arme pour défendre, attaquer aussi
celle qui ignore les prédécesseurs aussi sûrement qu'elle veut ignorer les différents habitants actuels et à venir
sans doute culpabilisée par le passé mais voulant le revivre, l'esclavage a laissé un goût paradoxal dans la mémoire

LES représentants que l'on voit à l'écran- je pense surtout à Boebert Lauren, qui est une élue mais de quel état?? pourrraient nous renseigner sur ce background où ils se sont faits élire et sur lequel ils prospèrent: l'arme, ah le second amendement, quelle bonne idée et depuis que cette idée les armes ont bien prospéré;

plus de deux amériques mais au moins deux

pladenn galet sac'het

 ne gav ket din e teuin a benn da saveteiñ anezhi met lennet m eus oa tu ober udb mestra:

pennad: dre belec'h kregiñ ganti araok goul ga sam vras

hag-eñ ez eus moaien dihuniñ urzhiataer al laez kozh ha distabil ken nemet un esa; ha marteze stagañ ivez houmañ dezhañ

pe chench  leve e lec'h un all, 

pe hejan ane'i

Does your hard drive make a buzzing noise when you turn it on? Or does it make clicking noises or not spin up? Well, in this video I will show you how to fix this fairly common problem which is caused by the drive's heads getting stuck on the platters

Par chance je suis tombé sur cette vidéo, pas par chance! en fait non pas par chance mais les autres fois que j'ai googlé la question je me suis contenté des réponses premières et ce n'était pas sérieux, je pense qu'il faut avoir une méthodologie de départ que je ne connais pas pour se balader sur internet et YouTube 

Retraite

 72 ans en moyenne pour les médecins la première fois que je m'y suis intéressé durant mes études, et donc je me suis dit que le sujet ne m'intéressait pas que 72 c'était tellement loin ...

Ils vont donc retarder l'âge puisque la moulinette des calculs donne des résultats favorables aux comptes en procédant ainsi: se dire que les anciens partant ils laissaient la place aux jeunes n'est pas la bonne idée donc: il faut donc réduire à tous le niveaux: moins d'anciens moins de jeunes et au total dire que ceux qui sont actifs le seront plus longtemps; la dernière phrase est intéressante, rester actif le plus longtemps en terme d'année et travailler le moins possible durant ces années; et en commençant le plus tôt possible  dans la vie professionnelle, à travailler juste ce qu'il faut, juste ce qu'il faut. Un certain nombre défini d'heures, un certain nombre de jours par semaine, avec des garanties certaines. Le tout garanti et assuré par les pouvoirs publics. Collusion totale: je ne crois pas aux grèves. Ce n'est in fine que pour renforcer la collusion.

Peut-être faut-il pousser la logique jusqu'au bout, tout nationaliser, et en même temps, laisser une médecine à une autre vitesse s'établir. Mais il est vrai qu'il vaut mieux une mauvaise médecine pour tous qu'une médecine à deux vitesses-vieille antienne.

mercredi 4 janv 23

 Madison a des symptômes digestifs voire des spasmes aigus et un changement de lait a eu lieu qui n'a pas tout amélioré.

C'est la question du lait de vache et des ajustements.

3 janvier

 Dans une maison on trouve tous les jours quelque chose à faire à réparer et ça prend un temps extraordinairement...

Le climat est assez doux aussi les températures sont toujours positives pas de neige beaucoup d'eau heureusement de cette façon nous pouvons en terminer avec la chaudière bientôt nous passons à pompe à chaleur

mindset an occupiers

 

-There was me thinking he was too much of a buffoon to be anything other than a clown;Lukashenko doesn't want to be dragged into Putin's madness he also doesn't want Belarus to be part of Russia he only wants to remain undisputed leader of Belarus forever! Did you notice how hesitant he's to attack UKRAINE since the beginning of the invasion!
-Hang on a minute… How many of those Russian conscripts actually want to be there and how many of them are actually evil. Many would be middle aged and many would be young with family at home.

Another war with countless innocent people on both sides. Was that school loaded with mercenaries, for whom I have no sympathy? Or was it full of conscripts. There is I know, a reputation amongst Russian forces who are accused of atrocities. I dunno if the destruction of the school issomething to really rejoice about. I keep imagining all those dragged into the carnage by Putin who sits safely.

I guess I wonder about the ordinary Russian who is dragged unwillingly into the madness, just as so many ordinary Germans who weren't Nazis ended up on the Russian front.

An absolute horror. No other choices but to attack Russian positions. They have to be defeated.

Too bad Putin wasn't in that school.

That would definitely be reason to rejoice.

core Russians do not value freedom, cooperation and prosperity. They believe in raw strength, hierarchy and domination. And this mindset is shared by an overwhelming majority of Russians.
top-grossing film
This mindset is also called: chauvinistic, imperialistic, traditionalist, soviet. I prefer not to use the term ‘conservative’, because it has nothing in common with the Western conservatives. Completely different values and morale.
This set of belief is frequently mockingly marked homo soveticus. There is a story behind it: USSR had claimed to develop a new, better species of a human being, devoid of greed and selfishness. The label reflects that they indeed grew a new species, but with completely different traits.
Misunderstanding competition. Core russians always treat the western concept of competition as a hostility at best, ruthless fight till death at worst. This is reflected in their movies and stories about the West. As a result, in Russian business, such culture of competition is in place. They fight till they have no competitors, often relying on corrupt officials to drive competitors out of business. An ideal achievement for a core Russian is monopoly. Total domination of a market.

Such misunderstanding comes, probably, as a side effect of misunderstanding cooperatoon, and from Soviet culture, which described competition in such a way.

This approach applies to all spheres: business, sport, even pop culture. Only in Russia, garage bands spoil each other’s equipment and tear off posters.

Fatalism. Everything is pre-determined. A person cannot change their fate. We are little people and nothing depends on us. This is sometimes labelled as “acquired helplessness syndrome”.

Might is right. Core Russians only respect strength. Raw strength. This is why there are so much casual manslaughter, caused by a drunken brawl gone badly, including father-son debates. Any formal agreement (such as ‘law’), is only respected if there is some enforcement directly behind it, and punishment for violation is severe.

Crime does not exist. (derived from moral relativity). Everybody steal. If they are successful, they are lucky. If not, too bad for them. But stealing from me is a crime, and I will kill for that!

QUORA article 2 janvier 23

 

In recent weeks, Vladimir Putin has made it clear that he believes his country isn’t fighting a war against Ukraine, but against the entire Western world. While America is Moscow’s public enemy number one, the UK has cemented its position in second place, blamed for everything from supposedly goading Ukraine into assaulting Snake Island in the Black Sea to staging the harrowing massacre committed by Russian troops in Bucha.

“This was the work of British specialists,” Kremlin propagandist Vladimir Solovyov insisted

as pictures of bodies lining the streets of the Kyiv suburb surfaced last month.a senior Putin ally warned

that Britain could be “plunged into the sea” thanks to Russia’s nuclear capacity.

---

So how has the UK convinced Russia, as it has Iran, that it is the ‘Little Satan’ to America’s ‘Great Satan’?

For Moscow’s elite, Britain is often seen as a mirror image of their own country — a once-great empire intent on turning around its decline and restoring its superpower status. During the height of the Cold War, the rivalry between the two countries intensified when the Russia and the USSR became synonymous with spying.

Couple that with the rows over the poisoning of former Soviet spies including Alexander Litvinenko and Sergei Scribal on British soil, and it’s easy to see why this reputation has been formed.

Fundamentally though, Putin’s clash with the West is being sold in Russia as a battle for the soul of Europe against American proxies. Pro-Russian politicians like Marine Le Pen in Paris and the AfD in Berlin are painted in propaganda as standing up for their countries’ interests — friendly relations and cheap gas from Moscow. Britain, meanwhile, has few such sympathisers, and its role in the Anglosphere places it, in the minds of the Kremlin at least, as a transatlantic power rather than a Eurasian one.

On top of that has been the strength of British intel — something that the Kremlin deeply resents. It was, after all, US and UK intelligence, contrary to French reports, that warned in early February that an invasion was imminent. In addition, Colonel Philip Ingram, a former British Military Intelligence officer, told me that it is the UK, along with the US, which is providing almost all of the operational information to those defending Ukraine. “The Russians have been wound up by the fact they are suffering on the ground, in the air and at sea partially because of the fidelity of the intelligence being sent over,” he says.

And so, for the time being, when it comes to an easy target for their propagandists like Solovyov to blame, Britannia rules the airwaves.